michaelharley.net sysop: michael · est. 2012

IndieWeb link sharing - which method do you prefer?

1 min read

Link sharing is a fundamental piece of the IndieWeb. It's a kindness we show to other bloggers and sites. We share things we find good or interesting so that others may enjoy them, and it provides the author a bit more reach.

I notice there are two main ways people tend to share links.

The first is as link dump posts like the way Andreas does it. I assume they save the links as they're going about their week then post them all at the end of the week.

The second way is to post the shared links immediately as a bookmark or repost type post. Here is my own site as an example. These come out in dribs and drabs, but it's more in real time.

So, dear reader, I'm curious: which method of link sharing do you prefer? Link dumps or individual posts?

Poll

Which style of link sharing do you prefer?
  1. 4 votes, 31%
  2. 3 votes, 23%
  3. 6 votes, 46%
  4. 0 votes, 0%

13 people have voted so far. Voting closes Wednesday, September 30 at 8:05 AM. You can also vote on Mastodon; both ballot boxes count toward the same total.

Also on: Mastodon, Bluesky

Signal

3 likes
1 boost
1 mention
0 votes on Bubbles

6 Comments

Thread

Andreas (82MHz) via Mastodon

@michaelharley
*Andreas ;)
And yes, I save links to a text file when I come across them and then sit down Friday morning with a cup of coffee and put together the next post :)

violet 🩷💜💙 via Mastodon

@michaelharley
I don't think this is necessarily true or fair, but I think I tend to see individual link posts as 'sponsored' type posts and don't really read them beyond the title, but a link dump feels a little more like getting a look at a person's interests all together.

I think this is probably a carryover from social media that will need to be unlearned on my end, though.

Join the conversation